Don't let your S/4HANA migration freeze your supply chain.
S/4HANA programs take years, and the supply chain roadmap gets parked until go-live on the promise that the new core and its built-in AI will fix it. Orkestra runs alongside the migration instead: pick the one problem costing you most today, solve it in weeks, and plug it into S/4HANA when your new core is ready.
- Start with one pressing problem
- Live in weeks, not after go-live
- No SAP developers, no slot in the program
- Plugs into S/4HANA when it's ready
Supply chain roadmap: on hold until go-live
Trusted by
The S/4HANA migration doesn't stop the supply chain from costing money.
Most companies on ECC are in or near an S/4HANA program. The common move is to park every supply chain project until go-live, because the new core and its built-in AI were sold as the fix. Then go-live arrives and the problems outside the ERP are exactly where they were.
- 1
Program kicks off
SAP ends mainstream ECC maintenance at the end of 2027. The migration gets the budget and the best people.
- 2
Everything else waits
“S/4 will fix it” becomes the answer to every supply chain request.
- 3
Go-live moves
Programs this size rarely hold their first date. The freeze moves with it.
- 4
Go-live
The core is new. The carrier, supplier and 3PL gaps are where they were.
- 5
Catching up
Competitors who kept fixing things are a year or two ahead on what costs money.
What an S/4HANA migration fixes in your supply chain, and what it doesn't.
S/4HANA is a better core. It's worth doing. But most supply chain exceptions start with data from carriers, forwarders, 3PLs and suppliers that never lived in your ERP, and a new ERP doesn't change that.
What S/4HANA improves
Inside SAP, on the data SAP holds.
- One simpler data model for finance, inventory and orders
- Faster MRP and planning runs on HANA
- Embedded analytics on the data in SAP
- A clean base for SAP's own AI features
What's still broken after go-live
Outside SAP, where the exceptions start. This is where Orkestra works.
- Where a container actually is, and when it will really arrive
- A supplier moving a promise date in an email
- Whether three orders could have shared one truck
- A carrier invoice drifting from the contract rate
- Who owns the exception, what was decided and what it cost
SAP sells logistics add-ons for parts of this. Each one is another workstream inside the same program, on the same timeline, competing for the same people.
Pick the problem costing you most, and run a focused project on just that.
You don't need a supply chain transformation alongside an ERP transformation. Orkestra is built from micro-modules, so the first project is one pressing issue, one module and one site, lane or supplier group. Here's where most teams start.
Supplier dates slip and we find out at receiving.
- Supplier confirmation tracking
- PO change monitoring
- Promise date adherence
Nobody can say where the critical shipment is.
- Exception management board
- Delay risk prediction
- ETA confidence monitoring
Expedites get approved in a reply-all.
- Premium freight authorization
- Booking approval flows
- RFQ & spot quotes
Freight invoices drift from contract rates.
- Freight cost leakage detection
- Cost-of-chaos tracking
- OTIF root cause analysis
Missing PODs hold up invoicing.
- Missing POD tracking
- Customs readiness monitoring
- Claims evidence builder
The team watches screens instead of fixing things.
- Exception monitoring agent
- AI exception summary
- Workflow trigger agent
Parcel tracking lives in ten carrier portals.
- Multi-carrier tracking hub
- Delivery exception alerts
- Last-mile performance
High-value freight goes dark in transit.
- Live location tracking
- Condition monitoring
- Geofencing alerts
All 30 micro-modules you can start with
Each one runs on its own. Add the next when the first is paying for itself.
Load Building
- Load building agent
- Freight consolidation
- Truck count recommendation
Order Management
- Supplier Confirmation Tracking
- PO Change Monitoring
- Promise Date Adherence
Shipment Booking
- RFQ & Spot Quote Workflows
- Booking Approval Flows
- Premium Freight Authorization
Visibility
- Exception Management Board
- Delay Risk Prediction
- ETA Confidence Monitoring
Data Analytics
- Freight Cost Leakage Detection
- OTIF Root Cause Analysis
- Cost-of-Chaos Tracking
Communication
- Escalation Command Center
- Customer Update Manager
- Shared Resolution Threads
Document Management
- Missing POD Tracking
- Customs Readiness Monitoring
- Claims Evidence Builder
AI Agents
- Exception Monitoring Agent
- AI Exception Summary
- Workflow Trigger Agent
Parcel Visibility
- Multi-Carrier Tracking Hub
- Delivery Exception Alerts
- Last-Mile Performance Monitoring
IoT Tracking
- Live Location Tracking
- Condition Monitoring
- Geofencing Alerts
A focused project that runs alongside your S/4HANA migration.
No SAP developers, no change to ECC and no slot in the program plan. The team that owns the problem runs it.
Pick the problem
One pressing issue with a cost you can name: premium freight, half-empty trucks, late supplier POs, missing PODs. One site, lane or supplier group to start.
Connect what you already have
Carrier feeds, EDI 214 and 856 messages, supplier confirmations, TMS and WMS data, and ERP exports from ECC. No SAP development and no change to the systems in the migration scope.
Go live with the team that owns it
The logistics, procurement or plant team runs the workflow in Orkestra from week one. Exceptions become cases with an owner, not another report.
Measure it
Trucks saved, expedites avoided, POs recovered, hours given back. A number you can take to the steering committee while the migration is still running.
Add the next module
Once the first problem is under control, add the next one on the same data. Each module is a few weeks, not a new project charter.
Cut over without starting again
When S/4HANA goes live, the ERP connection moves to the new core. The workflows, rules and history your team built on Orkestra stay as they are.
Wait for S/4HANA, build it into the program, or run it alongside.
Every company mid-migration picks one of these for its supply chain backlog, usually without saying so out loud.
| Dimension | Wait for go-live | Build it in the SAP program | Run Orkestra alongside |
|---|---|---|---|
| First result | After go-live, often years away | When the program has room for it | Weeks |
| Who does the work | Nobody, the cost keeps running | The SAP team already on the migration | Your ops team, with Orkestra |
| Risk to the migration | None, but the gap stays open | More scope on the critical path | None, it sits outside the migration scope |
| Carrier, supplier and 3PL data | Still in portals and inboxes | A custom interface per partner | Pre-built connectors and EDI |
| At cutover | The project finally starts | Retested as part of cutover | ERP connection moves to S/4HANA, workflows stay |
| Cost profile | Expedites and empty miles every month | Migration day rates | A focused project priced on its scope |
Teams that didn't wait.
Live in 4 weeks
From kickoff to a live platform across dozens of carriers, with 83% more proof-of-delivery visibility.
Defense Logistics Agency
18% lower supply chain costs
From spreadsheets to one platform across factories in Europe and Mexico.
DBW · Automotive supplier
$11.6K saved per week on one lane
22 critical inbound shipments, normalized data and real-time alerts.
Global tire manufacturer
Not ready for a call? Start here.
Questions we get on every call
Pick one problem. Have it solved before go-live.
30 minutes. Tell us where your S/4HANA program is and what's hurting most in the meantime. We'll scope a focused project you can run alongside it.